Prediction of Takanyi Garanganga vs Cem Ilkel Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Garanganga vs C. Ilkel

Takanyi Garanganga

ZIM

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

586

288

Best Rank

144

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$13.3K

Career Money

$225.5K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Cem Ilkel

TUR

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'1" (185 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

586

288

Best Rank

144

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$13.3K

Career Money

$225.5K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Garanganga 3 - 0 Ilkel

They have played 6 sets in total, with Takanyi Garanganga winning 6 and Cem Ilkel winning 0. The last match between Takanyi Garanganga and Cem Ilkel was at the Davis Cup, Group II, 1R, ZIM-TUR 3-1, 03-02-2018, Round: Rubber 2, Surface: Hard, with Takanyi Garanganga getting the victory 6-4 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Garanganga	3
Ilkel	0

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(Rubber 2) Davis Cup, Group II, 1R, ZIM-TUR 3-1(02-03-18)

Stats

Takanyi Garanganga

Cem Ilkel

(SF) Turkey F51(12-25-16)

Stats

Takanyi Garanganga

Cem Ilkel

(QF) Turkey F24(06-17-13)

Stats

Takanyi Garanganga

Cem Ilkel

T. Garanganga vs C. Ilkel H2H Profile

T. Garanganga	Stats	C. Ilkel
$13,305	Career Prize Money	$225,530
54.48% (353-295)	Career Total W/L	56.52% (438-337)
3	Hard	0
9	Titles	7
3	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Garanganga vs C. Ilkel Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Takanyi Garanganga has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cem Ilkel has won 58.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Takanyi Garanganga, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cem Ilkel has won 49.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 19.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Takanyi Garanganga has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cem Ilkel has saved 63.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Takanyi Garanganga has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cem Ilkel winning 71.43% (W/L 30/12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Takanyi Garanganga has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 260/171), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 34/49). Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9).
Player level: In the last year, Takanyi Garanganga has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Takanyi Garanganga winning 3 times and Cem Ilkel being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Takanyi Garanganga winning 6 and Cem Ilkel winning 0.
The last match between Takanyi Garanganga and Cem Ilkel was at the Davis Cup, Group II, 1R, ZIM-TUR 3-1, 03-02-2018, Round: Rubber 2, Surface: Hard, with Takanyi Garanganga getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:28:20.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Takanyi Garanganga has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cem Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 424.21.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Takanyi Garanganga has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cem Ilkel has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Takanyi Garanganga has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cem Ilkel has converted 11.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Takanyi Garanganga vs Cem Ilkel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Garanganga vs C. Ilkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Garanganga	Stats	C. Ilkel
3	H2H Matches Won	0
6	Sets Won	0
38	Games Won	24
7	Aces (Total)	5
2	Total Double Faults	2
0:28:20	Average Match Time	0:28:20
66% (46/70)	1st Serve %	55% (26/47)
78% (36/46)	1st Serve Win %	65% (17/26)
38% (9/24)	2nd Serve Win %	52% (11/21)
100% (3/3)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/12)
40% (19/47)	Return Points Win %	36% (25/70)
100% (3/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/3)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Garanganga Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M25 Alkmaar - 21-06-2021
Q1 Guillaume DermiensG. Dermiens	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
M15 Sharm El Sheikh - 03-02-2020
R1 Louis TessaL. Tessa	L	3-6 3-1 ret.	Stats
M15 Monastir - 27-01-2020
R1 Louis HermanL. Herman	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
M15 Monastir - 20-01-2020
R1 Enrico Dalla ValleE. Dalla	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
M15 Maputo - 11-11-2019
QF Kelsey StevensonK. Stevenson	L	6-3 6-7(5) 6-4	Stats

View All

C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chisinau Challenger - 26-05-2025
R2 Petr Bar BiryukovP. Bar	L	6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
R1 Mukund SasikumarM. Sasikumar	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Tbilisi Challenger - 19-05-2025
Q1 Giles HusseyG. Hussey	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
M25 Tbilisi - 12-05-2025
R1 Evgeny KarlovskiyE. Karlovskiy	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
M25 Sharm ElSheikh - 21-04-2025
SF Saba PurtseladzeS. Purtseladze	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

T. Garanganga vs C. Ilkel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Garanganga	Stats	C. Ilkel
54.48% (353/295)	YTD Win/Loss	56.52% (438/337)
52.97% (777/690)	Sets Win/Loss	54.63% (979/813)
51.01% (7009/6731)	Games Win/Loss	51.54% (8791/8267)
60.32% (260/171)	Hard Win/Loss	61.41% (288/181)
43.40% (46/60)	Clay Win/Loss	44.53% (57/71)
42.11% (40/55)	Indoor Hard W/L	54.76% (92/76)
43.75% (7/9)	Grass Win/Loss	10.00% (1/9)
0.25	Aces Per Game	0.34
1692	Aces Total	2865
0.29	Double Faults Per Game	0.17
1918	Total Double Faults	1385
1st Match	Average Match Time	1:15:9
602.65	Average Opponent Rank	560.68
63% (16259/25822)	1st Serve %	58% (24152/41308)
71% (11576/16259)	1st Serve Win %	70% (16999/24152)
44% (4249/9562)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (8757/17156)
43% (1101/2570)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (1622/4023)
39% (10350/26322)	Return Points Win %	39% (16247/41803)
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	31.82% (7/15)
0% (0/0)	Masters W/L	66.67% (2/1)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	31.82% (7/15)
39.47% (15/23)	Main Tour W/L	17.86% (5/23)
47.37% (81/90)	Challenger W/L	52.23% (176/161)
58.97% (253/176)	Futures W/L	66.39% (241/122)
55% (344/627)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (426/756)
25% (2/8)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	40% (4/10)
47% (89/191)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (147/275)
59% (104/176)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (130/233)
88% (340/298)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (424/362)
12% (340/41)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (424/60)
18% (308/56)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (350/74)